GEO & AI Search

Is GEO Just Rebranded SEO? The Real Differences

2025-12-15 Arun Nagarathanam

Quick Answer

GEO is not rebranded SEO. While both share foundational principles, they target different destinations: SEO optimizes for ranking position, GEO optimizes for AI citation. The user journey, success metrics, and query patterns are fundamentally different. Think of it as evolution, not rebranding.

You're in a marketing meeting. Someone mentions GEO—Generative Engine Optimization.

A colleague rolls their eyes. "Isn't that just SEO with a trendy name?"

It's a fair question. With 84% of marketers now recognizing the term GEO (according to Search Engine Land research), the skepticism is understandable.

Let's look at what actually changed—and what didn't.

The Rebranding Accusation

The criticism has merit on the surface.

GEO and SEO both care about:

  • Quality content
  • Authority and credibility
  • Clear structure
  • User intent

So why introduce a new term?

Search Engine Land's editorial stance: "You can call it AI SEO, GEO, AEO, LLMO, or something else entirely—the terminology is secondary. What matters is what's happening: clicks and traffic have been vanishing since the emergence of AI Overviews and answer engines. That's not fear-mongering. It's observable data."

Source: Search Engine Land →

The name matters less than the reality: the destination changed.

What Actually Changed (The Data)

Here's what the data shows:

23

words per ChatGPT prompt

vs 4 words per Google search

Source: Andreessen Horowitz →

34.5%

click-through rate drop

for top-ranking content due to AI Overviews

Source: Ahrefs via Strapi →

The shift isn't theoretical. It's structural.

The Andreessen Horowitz perspective:

"Traditional search was built on links; GEO is built on language. We're entering Act II of search."

When query behavior changes this dramatically—from keyword fragments to full conversational questions—the optimization approach must adapt.

5 Real Differences Between GEO and SEO

Difference #1

The Goal

SEO

Get found in search results

Earn a click to your website

GEO

Get cited in AI answers

Become part of the answer itself

Why it matters: Users read AI-cited content directly within a conversational interface—they may never visit your site at all.

Difference #2

Success Metrics

SEO

Click-through rate

Rankings, traffic, time on page

GEO

Citation frequency

Reference rate, brand mention in AI outputs

Why it matters: You can rank #1 on Google and still be invisible to ChatGPT. New tools like Profound, Goodie, and Daydream track AI citations specifically.

Difference #3

Query Type

SEO

Keywords and short phrases

"best CRM software"

GEO

Full conversational questions

"What's the best CRM for a 10-person B2B sales team with a $500/month budget?"

Why it matters: Longer, more specific queries require content that addresses nuanced use cases—not just broad keyword coverage.

Difference #4

Authority Signals

SEO

Backlinks as proof

Domain authority, link profiles

GEO

Entity recognition + content clarity

Schema markup, semantic structure, factual accuracy

Why it matters: AI systems weight content structure and entity establishment differently than Google's PageRank. Clean HTML and well-labeled sections help AI parse your content.

Difference #5

Business Model Dependency

SEO

Ad-supported ecosystem

Google profits from clicks and ads

GEO

Subscription ecosystem

LLM platforms profit from user satisfaction

Why it matters: Different incentive structures create different optimization targets. AI platforms have no ad revenue to protect—they just want accurate, helpful answers.

What Transfers (And What Doesn't)

If you have SEO experience, here's the honest breakdown:

Transfers Directly

  • • Content quality principles
  • • Understanding user intent
  • • Technical site structure
  • • E-E-A-T concepts
  • • Keyword research methodology
  • • Analytics and measurement mindset

Requires New Learning

  • • Entity establishment tactics
  • • AI-specific schema markup
  • • Citation tracking tools
  • • Answer-first content formatting
  • • Multi-platform optimization
  • • LLM-specific ranking factors

The 60% rule:

About 60% of SEO skills transfer directly to GEO. The remaining 40% requires new tactics—but your foundation makes learning them significantly faster than starting from scratch.

The Verdict: Evolution, Not Rebranding

Here's the honest answer:

GEO is neither a revolution nor a rebrand. It's a reality check.

It forces marketers to confront what their brands stand for, what information about them exists in the world, and whether that information is trustworthy enough for both people and machines to believe.

The skeptics aren't entirely wrong—much of GEO builds on SEO fundamentals. But dismissing it as "just rebranding" ignores the structural shift in how people find information.

Consider the industry data:

84%

of marketers recognize GEO

42%

use GEO as their primary term

121%

quarter-over-quarter search increase

Source: Search Engine Land Research →

Whether you call it GEO, AEO, or "AI SEO," the optimization target has expanded. You now optimize for two audiences: search engines AND AI systems.

The question isn't whether GEO is "real." It's whether you're optimizing for where your audience is actually searching.

Frequently Asked Questions

Is GEO just rebranded SEO?

No. While GEO shares foundational principles with SEO (quality content, authority, structure), it targets a fundamentally different destination. SEO optimizes for ranking position in search results. GEO optimizes for citation in AI-generated answers. The user journey, success metrics, and optimization tactics diverge significantly.

Do I need to learn GEO if I already know SEO?

Yes, but you have a significant head start. About 60% of SEO skills transfer directly to GEO. However, GEO requires new tactics around entity establishment, AI-readable formatting, and optimizing for citation rather than clicks.

Which is more important: SEO or GEO?

Both matter for 2025 and beyond. Research suggests users now navigate between traditional search and AI platforms during a single research journey. The smartest approach is integrating both rather than choosing one.

Why are there so many names (GEO, AEO, LLMO)?

The field is new and terminology hasn't standardized yet. Research shows GEO leads in awareness (84%) and usage (42%). Whatever you call it, the core discipline is the same: optimizing for AI search visibility.

Stop Guessing. Start Knowing.

The GEO vs SEO debate matters less than knowing where you actually stand.

Take the free assessment to see how visible you are in both traditional search AND AI engines.

Take the GEO Readiness Quiz →

60 seconds · Personalized report · Free

Dive deeper into AI search with these related articles: