EMA Regulatory

Article 117 Consultation Procedure: EMA Opinion for Drug-Device Combinations

Arun Nagarathanam Aruntastic
Published: 25 Jan 2026
|
Updated: 25 Jan 2026

Quick Answer

Article 117 consultation is the procedure by which the EMA/CHMP provides an opinion on the quality and safety of an ancillary medicinal substance incorporated into a medical device. Required since 26 May 2021, it follows a 210-day timeline and the Notified Body—not the manufacturer—is the applicant.

You're reviewing a submission timeline for a drug-eluting stent. Someone asks: "Do we need EMA consultation before the Notified Body can issue the CE certificate?"

You pause. The device incorporates a medicinal substance where the action is ancillary to the device—but you're not sure whether that means you need to consult EMA first, or whether the Notified Body handles it independently.

Get this wrong, and your timeline extends by months. Get it right, and you can plan your pre-submission activities with confidence.

What Is the Article 117 Consultation?

Article 117 of the Medical Devices Regulation (EU) 2017/745 introduced amendments to Annex I, Section 3.2(12) of Directive 2001/83/EC. These amendments created a mandatory consultation procedure for certain drug-device combinations.

The core purpose: To ensure that when a medical device incorporates a medicinal substance with ancillary action, the EMA or a national competent authority provides a scientific opinion on the quality and safety of that substance—including its clinical benefit/risk profile.

Key distinction: This applies to medical devices with incorporated medicinal substances—where the device is the primary product and the drug action is ancillary. This is the opposite of integral DDCs regulated under pharmaceutical legislation, where the medicinal product is primary.

Products That Require Article 117 Consultation

Article 117 consultation applies to devices described in MDR Articles 1(8) and 1(9), specifically:

Article 1(8) Devices

Devices that incorporate a substance which, if used separately, would be considered a medicinal product—and which has ancillary action to the device.

Examples: Drug-eluting stents, bone cements with antibiotics, heparin-coated catheters

Article 1(9) Devices

Devices that incorporate a human blood derivative, which has ancillary action to the device.

Examples: Surgical sealants containing fibrin, haemostatic devices with human plasma components

When Is Article 117 Consultation Required?

Why this matters: Not every device with an incorporated substance requires EMA consultation. Understanding the triggers prevents unnecessary procedures—and catches requirements you might miss.

Article 117 consultation is required when a Notified Body is conducting conformity assessment for a device that incorporates an ancillary medicinal substance or human blood derivative, and the Notified Body needs an opinion on the quality and safety of that substance.

The Effective Date

Article 117 requirements apply to conformity assessment procedures initiated on or after 26 May 2021—the date the MDR came into full application.

Question

Does Your Device Require Article 117 Consultation?

Device incorporates ancillary medicinal substance

Yes - EMA or national CA consultation required

Device incorporates ancillary human blood derivative

Yes - EMA consultation required

Medicinal substance action is PRINCIPAL (not ancillary)

No - Regulated as medicinal product instead

Combined ATMP under Regulation 1394/2007

No - Separate Article 9 pathway applies

The key trigger is whether the incorporated substance's action is ancillary to the device. If the substance's action is principal, the product is regulated as a medicinal product—not a device—and follows pharmaceutical legislation instead.

What "Ancillary" Means

A substance has ancillary action when it supports, enhances, or complements the device's primary mode of action—but the device could still function (perhaps less effectively) without it.

Substance Role Example Regulatory Pathway
Ancillary action Antibiotic coating on orthopaedic implant MDR + Article 117 consultation
Principal action Drug in a pre-filled syringe delivery system Pharmaceutical legislation (Directive 2001/83/EC)

Post-Authorisation Changes

Article 117 consultation doesn't just apply at initial conformity assessment. It also applies post-certification if there's a major change to the incorporated substance that could impact:

  • The source of the substance
  • The manufacturing process
  • The amount or concentration
  • The method of incorporation
  • Any factor affecting quality, safety, or efficacy

Procedure and Timeline: 210 Days Explained

Why this matters: The 210-day timeline doesn't run continuously. Understanding clock stops and pre-submission planning is essential for accurate project timelines.

Article 117 Consultation Procedure

  1. 1

    Pre-Submission

    Notified Body provides intention letter 6+ months before submission. Device manufacturer collaborates on dossier preparation.

  2. 2

    Submission

    Notified Body submits consultation application to EMA using official application form.

  3. 3

    Validation

    EMA validates completeness. CHMP appoints one or two rapporteurs.

  4. 4

    Assessment

    210-day evaluation with clock stops for responses to questions or deficiencies.

  5. 5

    Opinion

    CHMP/EMA issues opinion on quality, safety, and benefit/risk profile.

  6. 6

    Publication

    Public assessment report (CPAR) published within 3 months of opinion.

The 210-day timeline mirrors the Centralised Procedure for medicinal products. Clock stops occur when the applicant (Notified Body) needs time to respond to questions—these periods don't count against the 210 days.

Pre-Submission Activities

EMA strongly encourages pre-submission engagement. The key elements:

Intention to Submit Letter

The Notified Body should provide this letter at least 6 months before the expected submission date. It must include:

  • Expected submission date
  • Scientific explanation demonstrating that the medicinal substance's action is ancillary to the device
  • Overview of the device and incorporated substance

Accelerated Assessment

In specific circumstances, accelerated assessment may be requested. Qualifying conditions include:

  • Devices used in serious diseases (life-threatening or heavily disabling)
  • Known medicinal substance or human blood derivative from a known source, where the CHMP deems the evaluation less extensive

Justification for accelerated assessment should be provided at least 10 working days before the CHMP meeting preceding the intended start of the procedure.

Infographic showing Article 117 consultation timeline with 210-day procedure, clock stops, and EMA/CHMP involvement stages
Article 117 Consultation Procedure: 210-Day Timeline with Pre-Submission and Post-Opinion Phases

Documentation Requirements

Why this matters: Incomplete documentation triggers clock stops and delays. Knowing exactly what's required upfront prevents avoidable timeline extensions.

Article 117 Consultation Dossier Requirements

  • Scientific explanation that substance action is ancillary to device
  • Detailed description of the device and intended purpose
  • Characterisation of the ancillary medicinal substance or human blood derivative
  • Manufacturing information for the substance — including source and quality controls
  • Non-clinical data supporting safety of the substance
  • Clinical data on the benefit/risk profile of incorporation
  • Documentation of substance-device interaction
  • Proposed labelling and instructions for use

The dossier is prepared collaboratively between the device manufacturer and the Notified Body. The Notified Body takes responsibility for submission, but the manufacturer provides the underlying technical documentation.

Quality and Safety Data

The EMA assessment focuses on whether the incorporated substance meets quality and safety standards. Key areas of scrutiny include:

Quality Assessment

  • • Source and origin documentation
  • • Manufacturing process validation
  • • Specifications and acceptance criteria
  • • Stability data for the incorporated form
  • • Impurity characterisation

Safety Assessment

  • • Toxicological profile
  • • Local and systemic effects
  • • Pharmacological interactions
  • • Biocompatibility considerations
  • • Clinical benefit/risk analysis

What Cannot Be Accepted

EMA guidance is clear on several documentation requirements:

  • Partial compliance: A Notified Body opinion or compliance statement concluding on partial compliance with GSPRs cannot be accepted—full compliance is required
  • Cross-references to national dossiers: It's not possible to cross-refer to the dossier of nationally authorised medicinal products
  • Scope misalignment: The scope of the Notified Body opinion must align with the intended purpose of the device for the specific consultation

Roles: EMA, CHMP, and Notified Bodies

Why this matters: Understanding who does what prevents miscommunication and ensures you're coordinating with the right parties at each stage.

European Medicines Agency (EMA)

  • • Receives and validates consultation applications
  • • Manages the procedural aspects and timeline
  • • Issues the scientific opinion on quality and safety
  • • Publishes the Consultation Public Assessment Report (CPAR)
  • • Provides advice to Notified Bodies on post-certification changes
  • • Manages fees for the consultation procedure

Committee for Medicinal Products for Human Use (CHMP)

  • • Appoints one or two rapporteurs to lead the evaluation
  • • Follows the 210-day assessment timetable
  • • Can grant accelerated assessment in qualifying cases
  • • Issues the scientific opinion on the ancillary substance
  • • For ATMPs, the Committee for Advanced Therapies (CAT) handles this role

Notified Bodies

  • • Acts as the applicant for the consultation procedure
  • • Prepares the consultation dossier with the device manufacturer
  • • Provides the intention to submit letter
  • • Responds to questions during the assessment period
  • Takes the EMA/CHMP opinion into account when making their decision on CE marking
  • • Informs EMA and consults on post-certification changes

Post-Consultation: Managing Changes

Article 117 doesn't end with the initial opinion. Changes to the incorporated substance after CE marking require ongoing communication with EMA.

When to Consult EMA on Changes

If changes are made to an ancillary medicinal substance or blood derivative incorporated in the device, the Notified Body must:

  1. Inform EMA of the proposed change
  2. Consult EMA to confirm that the quality and safety of the ancillary substance are maintained
  3. Receive updated scientific opinion if EMA determines the change could impact the benefit/risk profile

The Notified Body must consider any updated EMA opinion in its ongoing conformity assessment. This creates a continuous regulatory relationship, not a one-time consultation.

Changes That Trigger Consultation

Change Type EMA Consultation Required?
Change in source or origin of substance Yes
Change in manufacturing process Yes
Change in amount or concentration Yes
Change in method of incorporation Yes
Administrative changes only Case-by-case

Practical Guidance for Regulatory Affairs

For Device Manufacturers

  1. 1. Engage early with your Notified Body - They're the applicant, so alignment is essential
  2. 2. Prepare comprehensive documentation - The dossier is collaborative, but you provide the technical substance
  3. 3. Plan for 210+ days - Include clock stops in your timeline; 18 months total is realistic
  4. 4. Establish change management processes - Any modification to the substance triggers EMA notification
  5. 5. Request pre-submission meeting - EMA encourages this at least 6 months before submission

For Notified Bodies

  • • Provide intention to submit letter 6+ months before expected submission date
  • • Include scientific justification that substance action is ancillary
  • • Collaborate closely with device manufacturer on dossier preparation
  • • Take EMA/CHMP opinion into account for CE marking decision
  • • Maintain ongoing communication with EMA for post-certification changes

Timeline Planning Tips

  • Minimum realistic timeline: 18 months from intention letter to CE decision
  • Pre-submission activities: 6 months minimum
  • Assessment period: 210 days (plus clock stops)
  • NB decision post-opinion: Variable, but typically 2-3 months
  • Buffer for questions: Add 3-6 months for clock stops

Key Regulatory Milestones

26 May 2021

MDR came into full application; Article 117 consultation requirements apply

210 Days

Maximum CHMP assessment period (excluding clock stops)

6 Months

Recommended lead time for intention to submit letter

References

  1. 1. Regulation (EU) 2017/745 on medical devices (MDR), Article 117
  2. 2. EMA Recommendation on Procedural Aspects and Dossier Requirements for Consultation
  3. 3. EMA Q&A on implementation of medical devices and IVD regulations
  4. 4. Directive 2001/83/EC, Annex I, Section 3.2(12) as amended
  5. 5. EMA Procedural Advice on Consultation for Combined ATMPs

Need faster answers on EMA procedures? RegulatorySense delivers instant, authoritative guidance with citations.

FAQ

What is the purpose of Article 117 consultation?
Article 117 consultation ensures the device component of an integral Drug-Device Combination (iDDC) complies with the General Safety and Performance Requirements (GSPRs) in MDR Annex I. It requires EMA/CHMP to issue an opinion on the quality and safety of the incorporated substance, including its benefit/risk profile.
When did Article 117 consultation requirements come into effect?
Article 117 requirements apply to Marketing Authorisation Applications (MAAs) submitted on or after 26 May 2021. It does not apply retrospectively to iDDCs already authorised or to MAAs submitted before this date.
How long does the Article 117 consultation take?
The CHMP follows a 210-day assessment timetable, with opportunities for clock stops to allow the applicant to respond to questions. Accelerated assessment may be available in specific cases, such as devices for serious diseases.
Who is the applicant for Article 117 consultation?
The Notified Body is the applicant for the Article 117 consultation procedure, not the device manufacturer. The consultation dossier is prepared in close collaboration between the device manufacturer and the Notified Body.
Does Article 117 apply to combined ATMPs?
No. Article 117 does not apply to combined Advanced Therapy Medicinal Products (ATMPs) as defined under Article 2(1)(d) of Regulation (EC) No 1394/2007. These have a separate consultation pathway under Article 9 of the ATMP Regulation.

Uncertain About Your Article 117 Documentation?

Article 117 consultations require precise coordination between Notified Bodies, manufacturers, and EMA. Take our 2-minute assessment to discover where gaps might exist in your regulatory research confidence.

Stop searching through hundreds of PDFs. Get authoritative answers in seconds.

Take the Assessment →

5 questions · Personalized insights · Free