Where this gets real
Two of the three below will go smoothly. The third probably will not, and that is the one worth your time.
Turn this messy folder of research notes into one brief I could hand to somebody, keeping every source link attached to the claim it supports. Tell me anything you had to guess.
And then you have to judge what came back, which is the real skill.
200,000+
learners on Udemy
190
countries
10 years
teaching this way
If you found this through one of my Udemy courses, you already know how I teach. Same approach here, pointed at something new.
If you have been here before, you know the shape of it. You describe what you want in plain language and it does the work on your real files, with no code for you to read or assemble.
What is worth doing this week is the attempt that does not land cleanly. Something comes back, most of it is right, one part is quietly wrong, and you have to find which part. That is where people either get good at working this way or give up on it, and meeting it once now will make more sense of the course than any amount of reading.
The first two are for proving the point. The third is for meeting the difficulty honestly, which is more useful than another win.
Most people reading this do not have Claude Code in front of them yet, and that is fine. If you do, take one of these and point it at your own work. If you do not, read them as what is now possible, because this is the shallow end of it.
One
The distance between wishing something existed and it existing used to be measured in skills you did not have. Now it is measured in how clearly you can say what you want.
Build me a page where I paste in a long transcript and get back the five things worth quoting, with timestamps. Keep it simple and open it when it works.
Your own tool, shaped to your own work.
Two
Everything repetitive in your week is a description you have never had to write down. Writing it down once is now the whole of the job.
Go through every page on my site and every deck in this folder, and build me one list of every number and statistic I have quoted, with where each one appears, so I can see which have quietly gone out of date.
A week with less of your week in it.
Three
Try this one before the doors open, because something will come back mostly right and quietly wrong in one place. What you do at that moment is the actual skill, and it is the part nobody teaches, which is why the course is built around it.
Take this messy folder of research notes and turn it into one brief I could hand to somebody, keeping every source link attached to the claim it supports. Tell me anything you had to guess.
A first honest look at judging the work rather than receiving it.
If the third came back imperfect, nothing went wrong. You met the actual work, which is deciding what to keep, naming what was off, and sending it back.
What comes after the three
The course is being finished now, and this list hears the moment it opens.
What it is for is the part you just met. Pointing this at anything and staying in charge of it: knowing what a piece of work will cost before you start, drawing the line around what it may touch, catching the wrong part without being told it is there, recovering when it goes badly, and being able to say afterwards what you actually did.
It starts from nothing assumed. If today was the first time you typed one of those sentences, that is the right amount of preparation.
It worked and you are not sure why
You can do it again deliberately
A wrong answer costs you an afternoon
You catch it in the first minute
You are hoping it behaves
You decided in advance what it may touch
Your name and email, and you are one of the hundred. It is not offered again.
You are told the course is open, and you can start, before the announcement reaches anybody else. Founding member is the first hundred names and it is not offered again.
The Claude Code Accelerator Toolkit arrives shortly after the course, and founding members get it at a founding member price. If you run a business and you want the work in it automated properly, the same applies to the consultation, along with a spot held for you rather than a queue.
There is one more thing arriving on the day, and it goes to founding members only. I would rather it stayed a surprise than became another bullet point on a page.
Most of this course is not filmed yet. The questions the first people ask are what decide the order it gets made in, which is a real amount of influence and it only exists at the beginning.